Numbers run everything.
They shape how we move, what we prioritize, how we measure worth, and where we place our attention. From the moment we wake until the moment we fall asleep, we’re governed by numbers. Bank balances. Deadlines. Birthdays. Bills. Schedules.
But when you really think about numbers, you start to realize that all they really are is something humans made up. We made them up to measure [things], organize [things], and attribute value [to things].
Numbers themselves are just symbols that we’ve agreed mean something.
But over time, we’ve assigned them meaning, and with that meaning, they’ve evolved into something much more powerful: money.
So really, that’s all money is—a made-up thing, created inside a system that decided that numbers meant something. A system that introduced the idea that these numbers would measure value. What started as a rational creation gradually transformed into invisible laws—laws that formed entire systems now woven into the fabric of our culture, shaping every aspect of our lives. Most of us don’t even realize the depth of their influence.
Time, for instance, is our only shared resource.
We all get 24 hours in a day. Seven days in a week. Yet, we experience those hours differently, shaped by where we are in our lives: our age, our state of mind, our responsibilities. Time is both universal and wildly personal. Some of us are sprinting. Others are stalling. Some are barely holding on. But we’re all moving through the same shared timeline, divided by a system that turns life into a series of numbers. You’re either early or late. Ahead or behind. Young or old. Fat or thin. Rich or poor. Productive or wasting time. It never really stops.
Then there’s money. Another number that imposes massive stress.
On us. On our systems. We like to think we live in a merit-based world, but numbers don’t always reflect value. Some of the people offering the least amount of value to the collective human experience are the most rewarded in a numbers-based value system (think: investment bankers, day traders). While others—those who care, build, teach, hold space (think: carpenters, moms, teachers, healers)—barely register.
Wealth, for the most part, is a numbers game. One that only a few know how to play. The rest of us? We’re stuck chasing numbers that were never designed for us to win.
Still, there’s a way through this.
It begins with reimagining numbers-based currency—or money. Not as something that represents a linear value system, but as something multi-dimensional that belongs to a larger value system. What if money could reflect actual human values? Things like integrity, care, or contribution? And what if financial systems were built to honor these values?
Systems like this would need to function more like organisms than machines.
This idea isn’t new. Take the Bauhaus movement—they understood it a century ago.
Bauhaus architecture and design didn’t exist to impress or accumulate—it existed to support. Each structure asked: How does this serve the body? Chairs weren’t just objects. Rooms weren’t just spaces. They were extensions of the human form, designed with care and clarity. Alignment mattered—not because it looked good, but because it felt right. If money systems were built with the same ethos—form following function, rhythm over rigidity—we wouldn’t just live differently. We’d feel differently. More supported. More whole.
And that redesign starts with the individual. With the body.
Think about your own body. Scan it. Where is your mind at? Your heart? Your physical self? Do they all feel “on” or connected?
Now consider that your spine is the thing that connects all three. Like an unseen bridge, the spine connects every part of you, carrying the weight of your existence while allowing you to move freely. It is [literally and figuratively] the backbone of your being, holding you upright in both body and spirit.
The spine keeps you whole, connected—Mind. Heart. Body.
When everything is connected and “on,” the spine functions as whole, or “one.”
So, to function as “one,” your mind, heart, and body all need to be aligned. When any of these parts is compromised—physically, emotionally, mentally—your spine becomes weak—or “zero.” This binary might seem harsh, but it simplifies something we intuitively understand—that when we’re aligned, we’re on. When we’re not, we’re off.
So much of life is about trying to get back to one.
To wholeness. To presence. To the place where we can say: I’m good. I’m here. I’m whole. My spine is strong. It is upright. It is one. And in a world where one is of value and zero is of none, we might begin to think about how we can tie this state of our inner system, to our external system(s) [of value].
Every moment of on and off is a potential data point, tracked in real time to collect the information needed to help you stay in ‘oneness’ as much as possible. This data is precious—it should be created by you and for you. And because of its value, it should hold worth not only to you but also in the larger marketplace. Every data point shared should be entirely your choice, serving as a form of currency that you can hold, exchange, or give away.
Because every day, we generate vast amounts of data—our personal maps, leaving behind a trail of ones and zeros that tell companies and computers who we are, how to reach us, how to make us laugh, cringe, cry, or buy. Until now, these companies have been the sole beneficiaries of the wealth generated from this data. A system where data points equal numbers; numbers equal money; and money equals value. A system designed in a way where money is hard to make and easy to exchange.
So, why not flip this? Expand our understanding of money to create a mirrored system where money is easy to make and hard to exchange. A system where we generate our own currency—based on our own personal value(s)—whenever we choose. This mirrored system would restore balance by rethinking how value flows, not just through the marketplace but through the individual as well. By giving each person control over their data and currency, we reconnect them with their intrinsic worth. This system wouldn’t just measure the external; it would honor the inner equilibrium of oneness—where mind, body, and spirit are aligned.
Because when we generate and govern our own currency, we understand the true value of the data behind it. And when we understand the value of the data, we become more discerning about who we share it with.
This is true sovereignty. Not Bitcoin. Not fiat. Not numbers. Just your own personal data. Real data. In real time. That becomes your currency. Your value. Your choice.
—
Inspired by the H11 project.
Dear Septima Elle,
Your article “The Numbers Are Breaking—How we Define Value Needs to Change” resonates deeply in our current moment, where the limitations of numerical metrics have become increasingly apparent. I’d like to expand on your thoughtful critique by offering some concrete pathways that might help bridge your philosophical insights with practical implementation.The Invisible Architecture of Value
You eloquently note that “numbers themselves are just symbols that we’ve agreed mean something.” This observation strikes at the heart of our collective fiction around value. What began as tools for measurement have become the masters of our attention and worth.
As you write:
This invisible architecture extends beyond just financial systems. Consider how social media platforms have reduced human connection to likes, followers, and engagement metrics. Or how education systems quantify learning through standardized test scores. The problem isn’t just financial—it’s epistemological. We’ve confused the map for the territory.Expanding the Bauhaus Metaphor
Your reference to the Bauhaus movement provides a powerful framework. As you note, Bauhaus design “didn’t exist to impress or accumulate—it existed to support.” This principle could be expanded beyond individual well-being to community and ecological health.
What if economic systems were designed with the same principles that guide sustainable architecture? Just as Bauhaus asked “How does this serve the body?”, economic systems could ask “How does this serve the community? The ecosystem? Future generations?”Data Sovereignty and Value Plurality
Your proposal that “every data point shared should be entirely your choice, serving as a form of currency that you can hold, exchange, or give away” points toward what I’d call “value plurality”—recognizing multiple forms of wealth beyond financial capital.
Building on this, I envision a multi-layered value system that might include:
The Spine as Systems Metaphor
Your metaphor of the spine as connecting mind, heart, and body offers a powerful systems thinking framework. You write:
This alignment principle could extend to how we design economic systems. Currently, our financial systems are misaligned with our social and ecological systems—they optimize for financial returns while externalizing social and environmental costs.
What if economic metrics were required to demonstrate alignment across multiple dimensions of value? Just as ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) metrics have begun to expand how we evaluate companies, we could develop more sophisticated measures that assess alignment between financial, social, ecological, and personal well-being outcomes.Practical Next Steps
To move from concept to implementation, I propose several concrete steps:
The Binary Beyond One and Zero
Your binary of “one” (alignment) and “zero” (misalignment) offers an elegant simplicity. Yet I wonder if there’s room for a more nuanced spectrum. Perhaps what we need isn’t just a binary shift but a more dimensional understanding of value—one that recognizes the complex interplay between individual wellbeing, community health, and planetary boundaries.
As you powerfully state:
I’d suggest that true sovereignty might emerge not just from individual data ownership, but from our collective capacity to recognize and honor multiple forms of value simultaneously. The challenge isn’t just redistributing financial wealth, but redistributing our attention and respect across different forms of value creation.Conclusion
Your vision points toward a profound reimagining of how we measure, create, and exchange value. By extending your metaphors of the spine, the Bauhaus principles, and data sovereignty, we might begin to sketch the outlines of economic systems that truly serve human flourishing rather than reducing humans to serve economic metrics.
The path forward isn’t just about creating new currencies or metrics, but about expanding our collective imagination about what constitutes value in the first place. Your article makes a vital contribution to this essential conversation.
In solidarity toward a more aligned future,
[A fellow explorer of value beyond numbers]
LikeLike